(1)European Space Agency, ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.
(2)Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino, Turin, Italy
(3)Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Berlin-Adlershof, Germany
Presented at the International Meteor Conference, 18 – 20 Sep 2003
·space-qualified
wide-angle optics;
·Simple,
but very light-sensitive detector;
·Software
for the detection of the events of scientific interest to reduce the data
volume to be downlinked.
The contractors
will perform the following activities as part of this study:
·Analyze
the science requirements, derive technical requirements
·Produce
a design for a space-qualified camera head with software
·Build
a ‘breadboard’, that will demonstrate that a flight-qualified version could
be built
·Perform
a real-sky test
·Deliver
the breadboard to the Agency to allow further testing
As part of
the “Invitation to Tender” for the proposal, a number of very clear scientific
science goals were given. These are listed in the following section.
(a)Imaging,
from orbit, of electric discharges, e.g. lightning flashes, sprites,
discharges due to dust storms;
(b)Imaging
of noctilucent clouds and aurorae;
(c)Imaging,
from orbit, of meteors, i.e. the light emitted when a dust particle
enters an atmosphere;
(d)Imaging,
from orbit, of space debris entering the Earth’s atmosphere;
(e)Imaging
of impacts onto planetary surfaces;
(f)Imaging
from a lander that lands on the dark side of a planet or moon.
In the requirements for the proposal, preliminary technical requirements were derived from the scientific goals. As the possible science goals are very diverse, the proposers were requested to concentrate on goals (a) and (c) for the building of the breadboard, even though all science goals have to be assessed in the study.
The
preliminary technical requirements – which will be detailed by the proposal
teams – are listed in Table
1.
They address items such as the sensitivity of the camera, the field of
view, how long should it be operating, what is the efficiency of the detection
algorithm, how accurate shall the location be identified, how accurate
shall the luminosity be identified, and, which spectral sensitivity shall
the camera have. Clearly, the main technical drivers are the wide field
of view (120 x 120 degrees), which are very large for a space-qualified
optics, together with the required light sensitivity. The required light
sensitivity means that it may not be enough to design a system with a regular
CCD detector, but it may be required to use an image intensifier or a so-called
electron-multiplied CCD (addressed in a later section).
Table1:
Derived technical requirements for the "Smart Panoramic Sensor Head".
|
Property
|
Requirement
|
Comment
|
|
Camera
sensitivity
|
The
camera shall Image with a Signal-to-Noise ratio > 5, an object of visual
magnitude Mv = 6 mag or brighter, moving with a maximum apparent speed
of 5 deg/s
|
The
apparent velocity will affect the dwell time of the object on one pixel.
|
|
Field
of view
|
120
deg x 120 deg or larger
|
|
|
Operating
cycle
|
The
camera shall record the night side of a planet for more than 80 % of the
time.
|
This
affects the relation between exposure time and readout time. Note that
if a long exposure is assumed, SCI-020 should still be fulfilled even at
the end of the exposure (this might limit the dark current).
|
|
Time
accuracy
|
The
camera shall allow to determine the time of an event to an accuracy of
10 s.
|
It
is envisaged that this limits the maximum exposure time.
|
|
Detection
efficiency
|
The
applied software algorithm to detect the events shall not have more
than 100 % false detections, i.e. if in one hour there are two meteors
above 6 mag, it is acceptable to get two additional false detections.
It shall not miss more than 20 % of the events.
|
This
needs to study cosmic ray hits, noise, etc.; which algorithm to use
|
|
Spatial
resolution
|
The
spatial resolution shall be better than 0.3 deg
|
The
spatial resolution is not so critical.
|
|
Dynamical
resolution
|
The
dynamical resolution shall be better than 11 bits.
|
Needed
to study the shape of the light curve.
|
|
Spectral
sensitivity
|
400
to 850 nm
|
In space applications, the major resource constraint is the data downlink volume. This is particularly true for interplanetary missions, for example if a camera like this were in Mars orbit. Therefore, a software routine is needed that detects potential events and downlinks only that part of the image that contains the event. This is similar to the well-known software MetRec (Molau 1996 [1]). Some changes need to be done though. Space-based computers typically are slow systems with processor speeds of only a few Megahertz to make them less sensitive to cosmic radiation. Also, flight software needs a number of safety routines that avoid the processor going into an endless loop for example. This software is under development.
The current studies indicate that, from a low Earth orbit, it should be possible to record between 10 and 50 meteors per hour down to a magnitude of 6. For a good analysis of the light curve, the peak magnitude should be around 3 to give enough data points. This would still yield one or more meteors per hour. This should be compared to dust detectors flying in space, typically detecting only one event per day.
For 10 events per hour it is estimated that the camera generates about 250 kBit per hour. Assuming a continuous downlink, this corresponds to 70 bit/s. This has to be compared to the average daily downlink rate for e.g. a Mars mission which is in the order of 2000 bit/s. It can be seen that the meteor camera does not need a significant share of the downlink rate.
The current aim is to obtain up to 10 frames per second imaging rate, however, this may have to be reduced for technical reasons. Definitely it will not be possible to produce video frame rate.
From analyzing available flight hardware, it is estimated that the mass can be as low as 1 kg for the optical head and 2 kg for the complete system.
The main technical challenges will be:
·Develop space-qualified wide-angle optics;
·Ensure the correct selection of the detector – EM-CCD or standard back-illuminated CCD;
·Develop a robust, space-qualified version of the detection software.
As part of this paper, we have performed tests using an IXON EM-CCD camera. This camera was kindly provided by LOT Oriel from Darmstadt,. Germany. Figure 1 shows a sample image of Lyra, using a commercial 25 mm f/0.85 Fujinon lens, taken under the bright skies of Berlin. Stars of 6.5 mag are still visible at an exposure time of 42 ms.
Comparing
this camera to image-intensified cameras, it is clear that this detector
would be a promising candidate for the space camera. However, using a large-aperture
optics would allow achieving the required sensitivity even with a normal
CCD detector operating at 10 frames per second.
Figure 1: Lyra (half hidden behind a tree)recorded with an IXON EM-CCD camera.
Figure 2: The IXON EM-CCD camera.
(a)International
Space Station (ISS) – on downward looking platform. Orbit between 300 and
400 km altitude. Operate at night (ca. 40 min per orbit), possibly only
above oceans to reduce background illumination
(b)Galileo
satellites – the future European navigation system. Several 10 satellites
in ca. 23000 km orbit (this would actually need a smaller angle lens which
is easier to build)
(c)University
satellite in Earth orbit – possibly cooperation with university under study
Ad (a): The ISS orbits the Earth very close to it, only about in 300 to 400 km height. Figure 3 shows the footprint a camera with 120 deg field of view would see. The diameter of the area on ground would be about 1550 km x 1550 km. Of course, operations are hampered by Earth background lights such as cities. These need to be taken into account by the detection software.
Figure 3: Footprint of a camera with 120 deg field of view on the ISS.
Ad (b): The Galileo satellites are the European pendant to the US GPS system, which allows global navigation. The program is just being started, and about 30 satellites are to be launched into space in an orbit just below geostationary orbit. While this is far away, resulting in a loss of signal strength due to the large distance of about 30000 km, it would allow global coverage of the Earth.
Ad (c): To get a camera onto the ISS or a Galileo spacecraft means to participate in a formal bidding process, success is not guaranteed. A number of European universities plan to build small, low-earth orbit spacecraft to demonstrate its feasibility. It may be possible to fly such a camera on a University satellite.